Vol 10, Issue 3

Effects of Different Number of Sets of Resistance Training on Flexibility

Authors

Thalita B. LeiteFederal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Pablo B. CostaCalifornia State University – Fullerton
Richard D. LeiteFederal University of Maranhão, Brazil
Jefferson S. NovaesFederal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Steven J. FleckUniversity of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, USA
Roberto SimãoFederal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
International Journal of Exercise Science 10(3): 354-364, 2017.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.70252/YASG4874

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of six months of training with three different number of sets of resistance training on flexibility in young men. Forty-seven men (mean ± SD age = 24 ± 1yrs; body mass = 79.39 ± 9.12 kg; height = 174.5 ± 5.6 cm) were randomly divided into three training groups performing either one set (G1S), three sets (G3S), or five sets (G5S) of all exercises in a resistance training session or a control group (CG). All groups were assessed pre- and post-training for Sit-and-Reach test and range of motion of 10 joints using goniometry. The training protocol included three weekly sessions and was composed of nine exercises performed at a moderate intensity (eight to 12RM). The results demonstrated significant differences pre- to post-training for the Sit-and-Reach test for all training groups; however, only the G5S showed significant differences when compared to the CG (31.04 ± 5.94cm vs. 23.56 ± 6.76cm, respectively; p < 0.05). Of the ten joint movements measured, there were range of motion increases only to shoulder flexion (G1S), shoulder extension (G3S), elbow flexion (G3S), and knee flexion (G3S) when comparing pre- to post-training (p < 0.05). In conclusion, different resistance training volumes improved flexibility for some joints of young men. These findings indicate that performing only resistance training can result in increases in flexibility.

Recommended Citation