Vol 13, Issue 4

A Comparison of Quadriceps-to-Hamstrings Ratios During Isokinetic Testing, Cutting, and Drop Landings in Male Soccer Players

Authors

Shane O’DonnellLoyola Marymount University
Dana EitanLoyola Marymount University
Jenevieve L. RoperLoyola Marymount University
International Journal of Exercise Science 13(4): 157-166, 2020. 
DOI: 10.70252/PFUL6689

Abstract

Collegiate soccer is not an unusual place to suffer a knee injury. The sport has many dynamic movements, such as cutting, jumping and shooting. Many professionals use quadriceps-to-hamstring (Q/H) ratios as a tool to determine when an injured player can to return to game play or use the ratio to investigate how predisposed a certain player is to sustaining a knee injury. However, many of these ratios are taken in isokinetic testing in a controlled environment and to our knowledge it is unknown if these ratios are similar to those measured during dynamic activity. Therefore, this study investigated if there was a relationship between Q/H ratios measured during isokinetic testing and drop landings and cutting. Fifteen Division 2 collegiate male soccer players (age: 19.79 ± 1.25 years; height: 176.74 ± 6.22 cm; weight: 77.24 ± 11.01 kg). Wearing Athlos© compression shorts participants performed isokinetic testing, drop landings and cutting drills while muscle activity was measured. A significant difference was found between the bilateral Q/H ratios during the drop landings (p= 0.04; h= 0.49). There were no significant bilateral differences measured during the cutting drills in either direction and isokinetic testing (p> 0.05). Additionally, there was so significant relationship in Q/H ratios between isokinetic testing and the dynamic movements (> 0.05). This suggests that clinicians should use Q/H ratios during dynamic movements rather than isokinetic testing in a controlled environment to better assess player risk disposition and return-to-play criteria.

Recommended Citation