Vol 17, Issue 2

Effects of Resistance Training Techniques on Metabolic Responses in Trained Males

Authors

Alysson EnesFederal University of Paraná
Ragami Chaves AlvesUniversidade Federal do Paraná
Vinicius ZenFederal University of Paraná
Danilo Fonseca LeonelFederal University of Jequitinhonha and Mucuri Valleys
Gustavo OnedaFederal University of Santa Catarina, Brazil
Luis H. B. FerreiraFederal University of Paraná
Luciano R. GuiraldelliFederal University of Paraná
Roberto SimãoFederal University of Rio de Janeiro
Guillermo EscalanteCSU San Bernardino
Anderson Z. UlbrichFederal University of Paraná
Tácito P. Souza-JuniorFederal University of Paraná
International Journal of Exercise Science 17(2): 576-589, 2024. 
DOI: 10.70252/JYBG8718

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of bi-set, drop-set and traditional resistance training (RT) techniques on metabolic responses in resistance-trained malesFifteen trained males (age 29.7 ± 6.1 years; body mass 83.4 ± 7.6 kg; RT experience 11.4 ± 6.7 years; one-repetition maximum (1RM) barbell bench press: body mass ratio 1.4 ± 0.1 a.u.) were assigned to three experimental conditions, in a randomized crossover design. The experimental conditions were bi-set (3×10 repetitions at 70%1RM in barbell bench press followed by 10 repetitions at 60%1RM in incline bench press), drop-set (3×10 repetitions at 70%1RM followed by 10 repetitions at 50%1RM in barbell bench press) and traditional RT (3×20 at 60%1RM in barbell bench press). A portable gas analyzer was used to assess energy expenditure and maximal oxygen uptake during the experimental protocols. Blood lactate levels were assessed at baseline and 1, 3, and 5 minutes after the training session. There were no differences for total training volume (p = 0.999). Post hoc comparisons revealed that bi-set elicited higher aerobic energy expenditure (p = 0.003 vs. drop-set; p < 0.001 vs. traditional RT) and aerobic oxygen consumption (p = 0.034 vs. drop-set; p < 0.001 vs. traditional RT) than other RT schemes. There were no differences regarding anaerobic EE between-conditions (p > 0.05). There was a main effect of time and condition for blood lactate levels (p < 0.001). Post hoc comparisons revealed that drop-set training elicited higher blood lactate levels than traditional RT (p = 0.009). The results suggest that RT techniques may have a potential role in optimizing metabolic responses in resistance-trained males.

Recommended Citation