Authors
Jeferson L. Jacinto
João Pedro Nunes
Alex S. Ribeiro
Juliano Casonato
Mirela C. Roveratti
Bruna N. S. Sena
Edilson S. Cyrino
Rubens A. da Silva
Andreo F. Aguiar
International Journal of Exercise Science 14(2): 486-497, 2021.
DOI: 10.70252/QLQR5371
This study aimed to investigate the effects of free leucine supplementation on muscle recovery from resistance exercise (RE) in young adults. Fourteen untrained subjects (23.9 ± 3.6 years old) underwent RE sessions (leg press and hack squat: three sets of 8-12 reps at 70% 1RM) supplemented with leucine (LEU: two daily doses of 3g) or a placebo (PLA), separated by a seven-day washout period. Following each occasion, participants were evaluated in three subsequent days (24h, 48h, and 72h) for muscle recovery via a repetition-to-failure test. The following markers were assessed: repetition performance, perceived exertion, lactate, creatine kinase, muscle soreness (DOMS), testosterone, and cortisol. No significant difference was observed between LEU and PLA conditions (p > 0.05). Number of repetitions performed in the repetition-to-failure tests, perceived exertion, cortisol, and testosterone:cortisol ratio did not change over time (p > 0.05). Creatine kinase increased immediately after exercise, at 24h, and 48h, and was attenuated at 72h post-exercise, while testosterone, lactate, and DOMS increased at 24h post-exercise (p < 0.05) and remained elevated up to 72h. All outcomes were similar between LEU and PLA. Results indicate that a 6g daily dose of free leucine supplementation does not improve muscle recovery following lower-limb RE in untrained young adults.
Recommended Citation
Jacinto, Jeferson L.; Nunes, João Pedro; Ribeiro, Alex S.; Casonato, Juliano; Roveratti, Mirela C.; Sena, Bruna N. S.; Cyrino, Edilson S.; da Silva, Rubens A.; and Aguiar, Andreo F. (2021) “Leucine Supplementation Does Not Improve Muscle Recovery from Resistance Exercise in Young Adults: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Crossover Study,” International Journal of Exercise Science: Vol. 14 : Iss. 2, Pages 486 – 497.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.70252/QLQR5371